Saigon + travel
BackLocated on Washington Avenue in Philadelphia, Saigon + travel presents itself as a specialized service hub, catering primarily to clients with connections to Vietnam. The business model is multifaceted, combining the functions of a travel agency with international shipping and money transfer services. This positions it as a potential one-stop shop for a range of needs, from planning a trip to Southeast Asia to sending packages and funds to family overseas. Its accessibility is enhanced by its convenient location and its commitment to being open seven days a week, offering a degree of flexibility that many customers might find appealing.
However, a deep dive into customer feedback reveals a significant disconnect between the convenience offered and the actual service delivered. The business is plagued by a pattern of serious complaints that question its reliability, professionalism, and fundamental operational integrity. For prospective clients, understanding these widely reported issues is crucial before engaging with their services, whether for booking a trip or shipping personal items.
A Pattern of Service Failures
The core of the criticism directed at Saigon + travel revolves around a consistent failure to meet basic service expectations. Numerous accounts from former clients paint a picture of an organization struggling with operational deficiencies that directly impact customers' finances, property, and peace of mind. These issues are not isolated incidents but appear to be recurring problems noted over several years.
Reliability in Shipping and Financial Transactions
One of the most prominent areas of concern is the company's shipping service. Customers have reported severe delays that go well beyond promised delivery windows. For example, a package promised to arrive in Hanoi within 7-10 days was reportedly still undelivered more than two weeks later, with the agency becoming unresponsive to inquiries. This level of unreliability is particularly damaging for a service that handles personal and potentially time-sensitive goods. The frustration is compounded by a severe lack of communication, leaving customers in the dark about the status of their shipments.
Beyond shipping, their money transfer services have also come under fire. In one documented case, the owner allegedly forgot to process a money transfer entirely. When the customer returned to rectify the error, they were made to wait for the owner to arrive, showing a startling lack of urgency and accountability. For services where timeliness is critical—such as sending money for family needs or emergencies—such lapses are unacceptable and erode all trust. These incidents suggest systemic issues in their order processing and management, raising red flags for anyone considering them for important financial transactions or international travel arrangements.
Customer Service and Professional Conduct
Perhaps the most consistently criticized aspect of Saigon + travel is the conduct of its staff. Reviews are replete with descriptions of employees being rude, unprofessional, and unhelpful. Multiple clients have described interactions where staff members were dismissive and showed no interest in resolving problems. This poor service culture appears to extend from the front desk to the ownership level.
There are also serious allegations of dishonesty and a tendency to blame customers for the company's own mistakes. One of the most troubling accounts involves a customer who was told, nearly a month after sending a package, that it had been incorrectly weighed by the staff. The agency then allegedly held the package hostage, demanding additional payment for their own error. This practice is not only unprofessional but raises ethical questions about their business practices. Another client reported that a staff member spoke negatively about them to another customer over the phone, a clear breach of professional decorum that creates a toxic and untrustworthy environment. For a business that acts as a travel consultant, building trust is paramount, yet these actions do the opposite.
Implications for Travel Planning
While many of the detailed complaints focus on shipping and money transfers, the underlying issues of unreliability and poor professionalism have serious implications for their role as a travel agency. Planning a vacation, especially an international one, requires meticulous attention to detail, clear communication, and absolute dependability.
- Flight Booking Risks: If the agency struggles to manage simple package tracking or money transfers, a potential customer must question their ability to handle complex flight booking and itinerary management. A forgotten booking or an error in travel dates could ruin an entire trip, leading to significant financial loss and stress.
- Lack of Support: A reliable tour operator provides support before, during, and after a trip. Given the reports of unanswered phone calls and dismissive staff, it is reasonable to be concerned about the level of support one would receive if a travel-related issue arose, such as a flight cancellation or a problem with accommodations.
- Customized Trips and Vacation Packages: Arranging customized trips or booking comprehensive vacation packages requires a high level of trust and communication between the client and the agent. The reported unprofessionalism and lack of accountability at Saigon + travel suggest that entrusting them with a significant investment for a family vacation or a detailed tour could be a considerable risk.
Weighing Convenience Against a Troubling Reputation
On the surface, Saigon + travel offers an attractive proposition. The combination of tourism services, shipping, and financial transactions under one roof is undoubtedly convenient for those in the Philadelphia area with ties to Vietnam. Their seven-day-a-week operating schedule adds to this appeal. However, the wealth of negative customer experiences presents a stark warning.
The issues described are not minor inconveniences; they are fundamental failures in service delivery, customer relations, and professional ethics. From lost items and significant delays to rude treatment and questionable billing practices, the feedback suggests a business that does not prioritize its customers' interests. Even long-term, loyal customers have reported being treated poorly, indicating that a history with the agency offers no protection from these problems.
Potential customers must carefully consider whether the convenience of using a single provider is worth the documented risk of poor service, financial loss, and extreme frustration. The decision to engage with Saigon + travel should be made with full awareness of its deeply troubled reputation among a significant portion of its former clientele. While they may offer attractive travel deals, the potential hidden costs in time, stress, and unresolved problems appear to be substantial.